Offer In Compromise Valuation Issues

By John Ellsworth, Esq July 13th, 2010

Offer In Compromise Valuation Issues

One of the places the tax lawyer can really help the taxpayer in making a good Offer In Compromise is in the valuation of assets in order to establish the proper offer amount. This is because the IRS rules require that the taxpayer offer to settle his or her debt by offering what is called the net realizable value of his or her assets. Sometimes this means simply yard sale value, as in the case of a living room furniture suite. On the other hand this grows much more complicated when talking about the valuation of something like a small business. The lower the net realizable value of a taxpayer’s assets, the lower the offer that will be required by the IRS to meet its acceptance standards.

But beware of undervaluing an asset in hopes you can “get it past” the IRS. This seldom if ever works. The IRS can and will perform its own valuations in many cases, especially where the issues are complex and there’s more than a little money at stake.

You should always use realistic valuations and your tax lawyer should encourage this. Where necessary, don’t hesitate to use valuation specialists. For example, when valuing a small business you would be well-advised to use the services of someone like a CPA who has experience in this kind of valuation.

Please remember that for most small businesses and practices such as law practices or medical practices the value of the business might be largely based on the owner’s sweat equity. However, goodwill–as important as it is to the business–has no value when valuing a small business for your IRS offer. Thus, the value of the business is most often the value of its tangible assets on the books. While we’re talking about it, beware of this trap: It is customary when valuing businesses to use a multiple such as 1 x annual sales in order to arrive at a realistic value, or perhaps 2.5 x sales. Whichever might be appropriate, this entire approach is inappropriate because it results in double-counting the value of the business. Why? Because the OIC offer takes into account the income of the owner in determining the monthly payments the owner will be making over the life of the OIC.

Assets such as real estate that produces income, intangibles such as leases or contracts with customers and small closely held businesses or professional practices are all candidates for robust lawyering by the tax lawyer representing the taxpayer in making an Offer In Compromise. The tax lawyer should make certain he or she has strongly supported valuation claims with solid data and corroborating documentation.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 13th, 2010 at 9:00 pm and is filed under Offer in Compromise. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.